.png)
Research report
AI Does Not Remove the Bottleneck
Find your real workflow constraints before buying AI tools.
We engineer the product, tenancy, integrations, cloud and commercial foundations behind SaaS that needs to support real customers and keep evolving.
Clients we've worked with
Four phases from tenancy model to a platform your team runs.
Tenancy, data isolation and the cost-per-customer maths, decided together.
You getA tenancy decision record with the cost model attached
Auth, tenancy, billing and pipelines first — the load-bearing decisions.
You getA working foundation in staging, reviewed by your team
Product features in two-week increments on a foundation that holds.
You getWorking software in staging every fortnight
Observability, autoscaling and the runbooks that let your team operate it.
You getSLOs, dashboards and operational documentation
We engineer the SaaS product, infrastructure and integrations together, with its commercial model in view.
Products delivered
Years in business
Countries reached
Team members
SaaS and software products built around real operational and business requirements.
There is no single tenancy model that fits every SaaS product. Shared tables can reduce infrastructure cost but require rigorous tenant-aware access controls. Separate schemas or databases provide stronger isolation but increase operational overhead. The right choice depends on customer requirements, data sensitivity, compliance, expected scale and unit economics.
Not necessarily. A well-structured modular application can be easier and faster to evolve while the product is still finding its shape. Microservices become more compelling when independent deployment, team boundaries, scaling characteristics or domain complexity justify the additional operational overhead. Architecture should follow the product's actual growth requirements.
Yes. The work can involve more than moving the application to cloud infrastructure. Tenancy, identity, data isolation, billing, customer administration, deployment, monitoring and security may all need to change. We first assess what can be retained and what needs restructuring, then create a migration path that avoids unnecessary disruption.
Enterprise readiness can affect architecture well before the first enterprise contract. Requirements may include SSO, granular permissions, audit trails, data residency, security reviews, customer-specific configuration and enterprise integrations. We identify the requirements that matter to your target customers and design the product so they can be supported without creating a separate product for every account.
Pricing and architecture are connected when the product supports plans, usage limits, feature entitlements or metered billing. The platform needs reliable ways to identify usage and enforce what each customer has purchased. We design these rules so the commercial model can change without forcing widespread changes across the application.
We look at architecture and usage together. Database design, caching, background processing, storage, data transfer, autoscaling and third-party services can all affect cost. For AI-enabled SaaS, model and inference costs add another variable. The objective is to understand the cost of serving customers and make infrastructure choices that support healthy product economics.
Yes. AI can support search, recommendations, document processing, assistants, agents or workflow automation. The engineering work also needs to address context, data access, permissions, model evaluation, latency, reliability and inference cost. AI should fit into the existing product and architecture rather than become a disconnected feature.
Launch starts the next stage of product engineering. Real customers reveal new requirements, usage patterns expose architectural constraints and enterprise customers introduce new integration or security needs. We can continue as an engineering partner, improving the product, addressing technical constraints and evolving the platform as the business grows.

We first heard about them from our ex-CEO after he met them at a convention in Tokyo. The price, team, and setup were exactly what we needed, and the results exceeded expectations. We not only got a better app than planned but also learned a lot about our product and processes. We're so satisfied that we're starting a second project with them and would recommend them to friends—and even foes.
